Being described wrong costs you more than a ranking.

An assistant getting your rates, your terms or your regulator wrong is not a marketing problem. Keupera reads back exactly what it says, shows which sources it built that on, and leaves out anything it cannot verify.

Start for freeGet a demo
Prompt ResearchRun it now
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google
Claude
Grok
Codex

Something is answering questions about your money product. Unsupervised.

Scores that decide whether a model will name you at all.

Earn the sentence, then check it every day.

In a regulated category the question is not whether you rank. It is whether the thing describing you got it right, and whether it can show where it read that.

Brand match
Cheapest SEO platform with an APIHigh
you publish pricing
Ahrefs vs Semrush for a small teamHigh
you are the alternative
Best enterprise SEO for 500 seatsLow
not your segment
How does Google rank pages?Low
no commercial intent

High demand and a low match is somebody else's article.

The questions you can credibly answer

Every question comes back scored twice: how much demand sits behind it, and how plausibly you could be the answer. Chasing a question you have no business answering is worse than useless here, because being named on the wrong one is its own problem.

One workspace. The whole record.

Six tools on one brand. What was said, when, in which market, and what it was built on, kept rather than remembered.

AI Brand RadarYour questions asked daily in every market, with the answer kept word for word and the sources it was built from.Brand IdentityWhether a model can identify what you are and what you are regulated as, and the schema that settles it.Prompt ResearchThe questions worth answering, scored for demand and for whether you could credibly be the answer.Backlink StudioCitations with the domain rating, the traffic and the reason attached, so you can judge the neighbourhood.Bot TrackerWhich crawler read which page and on what day, so you know whether it has seen the current terms.Competitor StudioThe brands named alongside you, fetched live, with every past run kept and dated for comparison.

It will not invent a fact to fill a field.

Get a demo

The quote is the model’s own words rather than a summary of them, and the schema Brand Identity writes leaves unverifiable fields out rather than guessing at them. Where a number is an estimate, the FAQ says so. In your category that restraint is the feature.

The exact quote, kept
Sources ranked by use
Only verifiable references
Six trust platforms
Up to three checks a day
Three languages per run
Every run kept and dated
Cookieless, no banner

Find out what it is telling people tonight.

Start free

Two scores in an hour: whether a machine can identify your company, and whether the platforms it checks have heard of you.

Start for free
  • Entity and authority scored
  • The ambiguities listed
  • Schema written for you
  • No credit card
acme.com
Start tracking & analyse
Entity profile health62
Citations & authority41

Both analyses run in the background.

For the compliance review

The claims an assistant makes about you, and the source behind each one. Including the ones with no source at all.

Get a demo
  • Claims with their sources
  • Unsupported ones flagged
  • The quote kept in full
  • Every run kept and dated
What it claimed about youtoday’s run
ClaimWhere it read it
Fee structureyour pricing page
FCA registrationthe public register
Typical approval timea 2023 forum thread
Minimum balanceno source found

Two of these are right and current. One is two years stale and one has nothing behind it at all. That is the pair worth an afternoon.

Keep it under watch

Send the questions worth owning straight into a standing campaign and let it check them every day without anybody remembering to.

View docs
  • Questions scored before tracking
  • One click into a campaign
  • Up to three checks a day
  • REST API and MCP server
Ahrefs vs Semrush for a small team
AAI Brand Radartrack the prompt daily
CContent Calendarbook the article
AAI Editorfan-out as the outline
CCanvaswire it into a workflow
Also onThe REST API and MCP tools

The questions compliance asks

It cannot force a model to change its mind, and anyone claiming otherwise is selling you something. What it does is tell you what is being said, how often, in which markets, and which sources it was built from, so the correction you make is aimed at the thing the model actually read rather than at your own homepage.

No, and it should not be treated that way. Drafts, schema and outreach are all produced for a person to review before anything is published, and the whole publishing side can be set to hold every finished piece in review. Keupera is an instrument, not an approver.

Trust score, domain authority and estimated traffic are estimates built from what is publicly visible, the same way any tool outside someone's own analytics has to work. Read them as the weight of a site rather than a filing. The ranking URLs, cited sources and content gaps all point at real pages you can open and check.

That variance is why it runs on a schedule instead of as a spot check. Up to three checks a day, in three languages, each pass or fail, kept. The number you report is how often you passed across every run so far, which is a rate rather than an anecdote.

Every opportunity comes with the site's domain rating, its traffic, whether the link is dofollow and the reason that site would cite you, so you can judge the neighbourhood before you approach it. Nothing sends on its own: the draft waits for approval and goes out through your own SMTP, from your address.

Analytics sets no cookie and stores a one-way hash rather than an address, so there is nothing to add to a consent banner. Everything behind the dashboard is on the REST API on one key per organisation. Retention depends on your plan, and a date outside that window is deleted rather than archived.

Your time to shine

Take your SEO and GEO to the next level.

Start for free